Simulation in Teaching Clinical Reasoning Skills †Free Samples

Question: Discuss about the Simulation in Teaching Clinical Reasoning Skills. Answer: Introduction: Clinical reasoning is the process by which the clinicians and the nurses collect the cues, do the processing of the information, evaluate the problem or situation of the patient, plan interventions and implement them, evaluate the outcomes of the interventions and increase their knowledge from the process. The process of the Clinical reasoning is a cyclic process of interlinked clinical meetings rather than a linear process (Croft, et.al, 2017). For the development of the clinical reasoning model, the thinking strategies involved are description of the situation of the patient, collection of the information of new patient, reviewed and relate the information, interpretation of the information, recalled the knowledge, discrimination between the irrelevant and the relevant information, matching and predication of the information analysis of the information for diagnosing and identification of the problem, establishment of the goal and objective, selection of an action course and their evaluation (Croft, et.al, 2017). It is the prior responsibility of the nurse when he or she entered the patient room immediately collect the relevant data conclude the information and initiation of the relevant management. According to the clinical reasoning cycle, the health care professional has to examine and discuss the stages in the clockwise direction for the facilitation of decision making and empowering the clear care plan formulation (Lapkin, et.al,2010). The patients suffering from the chronic condition, the care required by these patients are influenced by the multiple factors and care prioritization given to these patients depend upon clinical care and patient needs both. There are number of principle that can be used for the management of the chronic condition Development of partnership with the patient related to the treatment Focus on the concern and priorities of the patient Follow the five As principle that are assessment, advise, agreement, assistance and arrangement Support self-management of the patient Organization of proactive supplements Linkage of the patients with support and resources that are community based Use of the written information such as registers, treatment cards and plans, for the patient monitoring and reminder, there should also proper documentation Assure the patient regarding care continuity In the case of the Peter Mitchell, care priority could be determined by understanding the clinical and the patient needs both. There should be maintenance of the treatment partnership with the patient and focus on the priorities and concern of the Mitchell. As in the case of Peter Mitchell, there is no one to take care of him so, primary health care nurse should support self-management of the Peter and try to connect him with the community support and resources. In the case of Peter management of the information in written format is necessary as it will help him to monitor and also reminds him about the treatment plan and progress. To know about the top two priorities of the care treatment, in the case of the peter Mitchell, the primary health care nurse has to follow the clinical reasoning cycle of Levett-Jones(Lapkin, et.al,2010).. As it is a cyclic process, there are numbers of stages or steps that have to be followed. The first step is the consideration of the situation of the patient. The situation means the disease condition of the patient either chronic or acute; the pathetic condition from which the patient is suffering, which medication and treatment are given to them (Levett-Jones et al., 2010). In the case of Peter Mitchell, the primary health care nurse should consider the situation of the patient. As from the case study, it is clear that Peter is 52 years old and suffering from the Type 2 diabetes and morbid obesity. By examining all the above information, the primary health care nurse can easily have the knowledge about the situation of the Peter Mitchell. In the second step of the clinical reasoning cycle, there is the collection of the cues and the information of the patient such as the review on the current medical history and collection of the information related to the current activity and the treatment given to the patient. In the case study, from the first stage, it is cleared that Peter is suffering from Type 2 diabetics, obesity and sleep apnoea (ODonnell, Jones, Howard, 2012). The current history of Peter Mitchell is that he was admitted to the hospital with the syndrome of obesity ventilation, uncontrolled diabetes, and sleep apnoea. His general physician referred him after he was examined with the diaphoresis, shakiness, high level of BGL, increased hunger and breathing problem during sleeping. He is a big smoker for 30 years and approximately smokes about 12 cigarettess/day. Examination of the past medical history revealed that he is suffering from Type 2 diabetes that was diagnosed 9 years ago, Hypertension, Obesity (wei ght 145kgs having 50.2m2BMI), Sleep apnoea, Depression that is diagnosed 3 months prior by General Physician), Gastro oesophageal reflux disease (Bloomgarden, 2006). The current medication given to the peter is Metformin 500mg BD, Insulin Novomix 30 B D, Nexium 20mg daily Lisinopril 10mg daily, Pregabalin (Lyrica) 50mg nocte, Metoprolol 50mg BD and on dischare from the hospital the last observations are height 170 cms, Weight 145 kgs, HR 102 RR 23 Bpm, BP 180/92 mmHg, Sp02 95% on RA (Bloomgarden, 2006). When Peter was previously admitted, he was seen by the dietician that recommended him the low energy and diet having high protein content for the weight reduction. The general physician of the Peter had already discussed the weight losing for the betterment of the disease condition but the Peter had done nothing to reduce weight because it seemed to be very hard for the peter (Uday, Campbell, Shepherd, 2014). The physiotherapist reviewed the Peter and recommended the light exercises. After that, the Peter was discharged from the hospital and referred to the community care unit for weight management and clinical care. From all the above information, it is easy for the primary health care nurse to collect the cues and the whole information of the Peter Mitchell. It is cleared that the chronic condition of the peter is due to his carelessness, social isolation, diabetes, smoking and obesity. In the third step, there is recognition of the changes in the patient condition. In the case of Peter Mitchell, the condition was not much critical in the initial stage; he was just suffering from the diabetes and having the insulin therapy. But as the time goes on his social isolation, obesity has worsened his condition. As peter has no family support, there is no one to motivate him for his health and support in the treatment. Due to his obesity and smoking habit, his diabetic condition become chronic and have effect on the functioning of other organs also such as problem of hypertension, sleep aponea, depression and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Thus, with time, his condition became chronic. So, from the study of the condition, cues and collection of information of the Peter, and processing of the information, it is clear to the health professional nurse that the top two priorities of the care for the peter Mitchell is Diabetic control and Obesity (Wilkin, 2011). After that, the primary health care nurse should identify the problems and issues that he or she will face during the care management. The nurse should follow the chronic health care principles for the management of the issues and problems that will faced during the primary chronic care by nurse and the Peter. In the case, Peter has no supportive system and motivation. The primary care nurse should follow the principle of the self-management, linkage with the support and resources of the community. The nurse should use the written documentation for the monitoring and reminding of the Peter and assured the Peter that there will be continued care. In the peter case, by following the clinical reasoning cycle first four steps, the health care nurse will be cleared about the top two priorities of care and issues that will be faced by peter and nurse during the care. After that, the nurse has to design the health care plan by the establishment of the care goals (Elding Larsson, 2016). As in the case of peter, the two priorities are diabetes and obesity, so the nurse has to make care plan accordingly by considering the issues and problems that will interfere in overcoming the goals of the care plan (Sosenko, Skyler, Herold Palmer, 2012). As in the case of peter, care plan could consider the issues and problems such as motivation for high protein and low calorie diet, treatment to reducing smoking and social care. After the consideration of above all concerns the primary health care should make plan to provide the priority care on diabetic and obesity. As in the case of peter, the nurse care plan should include the consultation the dietician for making the diet plan, motivation of the peter for weight management through little exercise and smoking habit reduction, his linkage with society and community and proper following of the treatment plan (Cleland, 2017). After the development of the care plan, the primary health care nurse should implement the plan and do the regular check in that either plan is followed properly or not. (Sosenko, Skyler, Herold Palmer, 2012). There is evaluation of the outcomes of the care plan, after following the care plan properly; the nurse should do the evaluation of the outcomes that is done by evaluating the two priorities that was chosen. If, in the Peter case, evaluation suggest that there is some improvement in his diabetic condition and he has reduce some weight then it means that care plan is effective and successful. If it will not happen then it means the care plan is not appropriate and requires changes (Cleland, 2017). By the following the Levett-Jones clinical reasoning cycle, it is concluded that in case of the Peter if his diabetic and obesity will be controlled and rest of the disease condition can easy to recover. References Bloomgarden, Z. (2006). Glycemic Treatment in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes Care,29(11), 2549-2555. Cleland, S. (2017). Double diabetes: the cardiovascular implications of combining type 1 with type 2 diabetes.Practical Diabetes,34(6), 210-213. Croft, H., Gilligan, C., Rasiah, R., Levett-Jones, T., Schneider, J. (2017). Thinking in Pharmacy Practice: A Study of Community Pharmacists Clinical Reasoning in Medication Supply Using the Think-Aloud Method.Pharmacy,6(1), 1. Elding Larsson, H. (2016). A Swedish approach to the prevention of type 1 diabetes.Pediatric Diabetes,17, 73-77. Lapkin, S., Levett-Jones, T., Bellchambers, H., Fernandez, R. (2010). Effectiveness of Patient Simulation Manikins in Teaching Clinical Reasoning Skills to Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Systematic Review.Clinical Simulation In Nursing,6(6), e207-e222. Levett-Jones, T., Hoffman, K., Dempsey, J., Jeong, S., Noble, D., Norton, C. et al. (2010). The five rights of clinical reasoning: An educational model to enhance nursing students ability to identify and manage clinically at risk patients.Nurse Education Today,30(6), 515-520. Liaw, S., Rashasegaran, A., Wong, L., Deneen, C., Cooper, S., Levett-Jones, T. et al. (2018). Development and psychometric testing of a Clinical Reasoning Evaluation Simulation Tool (CREST) for assessing nursing students' abilities to recognize and respond to clinical deterioration.Nurse Education Today,62, 74-79. ODonnell, J., Levett-Jones, T., Decker, S., Howard, V. (2012). NLN-Jeffries Simulation Framework Project Outcomes of Simulation Education.Clinical Simulation In Nursing,8(8), e410. Sosenko, J., Skyler, J., Herold, K., Palmer, J. (2012). The Metabolic Progression to Type 1 Diabetes as Indicated by Serial Oral Glucose Tolerance Testing in the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1.Diabetes,61(6), 1331-1337. Stuhlmller, A., Goodman, N. (2014). Reasoning about reasoning by nested conditioning: Modeling theory of mind with probabilistic programs.Cognitive Systems Research,28, 80-99. Uday, S., Campbell, F., Cropper, J., Shepherd, M. (2014). Monogenic diabetes and type 1 diabetes mellitus: a challenging combination.Practical Diabetes,31(8), 327-330. Wilkin, T. (2011). The convergence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in childhood.Pediatric Diabetes,13(4), 334-339.